|
China-Bashing Season Has Begun |
|
Written by Farish A. Noor
|
|
Wednesday, 23 April 2008 |
|
While the simplistic thesis put forward by Samuel Huntington in his work ‘The Clash of Civilisations’ reads like a paltry script from a bad movie, it has to be said that bad scripts are often the most believable and effective. It was Huntington who predicted that in the wake of the Cold War a new sort of conflict would arise, namely one configured along cultural-civilisational differences between the developed Western world and the mysterious, exotic and threatening East.
The two cultural blocs that were said to be the future adversaries to the West were the Muslim world and China, respectively. In the case of the former, it was opined by Huntington that with the demise of Communism the potential threat of Islam would be realised sooner or later for the simple reason that Islam and the West shared ‘bloody frontiers’ that were marked by centuries of conflict. This thesis, however, is patently false to anyone who has even the slightest idea of the history of Islam and the non-Muslim world, for the fact is that the frontiers of the Muslim world are not marked by violence nor stained by blood, but rather remain porous horizons marked by the eclectic culture of Islamic mysticism or Sufism: From Southeast Asia to China, from Africa to Europe, the furthest frontiers of the Muslim world are precisely where mysticism and the Muslim practice of inter-cultural dialogue and cultural cross-fertilisation flourished the most.
Related to Huntington’s fear of Islam was his fear of China, dubbed the ‘sleeping giant’ by Napoleon more than a century ago and which til today has yet to truly realise and demonstrate its full economic potential. Huntington’s crude thesis argued that in time the West would have to realise that non-negotiable cultural differences exist between the Western world and the Orient, and that these cultural differences would ultimately serve as the catalyst for an all-out confrontation between the West and China.
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 23 April 2008 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
A Wave of Change Across Southeast Asia? But counter-currents too |
|
Written by Farish A. Noor
|
|
Thursday, 17 April 2008 |
|
The
latest results from the governorial elections in the provinces of
West Java and North Sumatra, Indonesia, would suggest that a
sea-change of sorts is taking place in Indonesia. Shortly after the
shock election results following the General Elections held in
Malaysia earlier this year, the governorial elections of Indonesia
has led to the victory of the Justice and Prosperity party (PKS) and
the National Mandate party (PAN), both of which are Islamist in
character and both of which trace their ideological and intellectual
geneaology back to the Islamist Masjumi party of the 1950s that
struggled to make Indonesia an Islamic state until it was finally
banned by President Sukarno in 1960.
What
do these results entail and what does it say about the state of
Indonesian politics today? More importantly, should the victories of
PKS and PAN be seen as the victory of political Islam, and does this
signify a shift towards a more Islamist-inclined politics for the
rest of the country?
For
a start, we should begin with some important observations comparing
the results in Indonesia with the recent results in Malaysia. In both
cases, the parties that won fielded candidates who are young and
relatively unknown compared to the older veterans of the more
established parties like Golkar in Indonesia. Yet, as was the case in
Malaysia recently, it was precisely the relatively younger age and
lack of exposure that perhaps accounted for the victory of the
candidates of the PKS and PAN, for they were certainly not associated
with the older modes of politics in the past and were not involved or
implicated in many of the long-standing political and economic
scandals associated with the old regime that dates back to the time
of former President Suharto.
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 17 April 2008 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Farish A. Noor
|
|
Sunday, 13 April 2008 |
|
So far, so good: Two months on after the general elections of March it
would appear as if some semblance of normality has returned and
Malaysian life is meandering along at its normal KL-traffic jam pace.
Despite the scare tactics that were employed during the election
campaign, none of the worst-case scenarios have been played out and our
mothers have not been rushing to the local sundry shops to stock up on
Ayam brand sardines.
There have, however, been some odd rumblings in the distance that we
ought to take notice of: It was reported that members of the Islamic
party PAS have called on the PAS state assemblymen in Selangor to work
on improving the image of the party in the state, beginning with some
rather cosmetic attempts at Islamisation that include the proposal to
build more prayer houses and prayer rooms for Muslims in markets and
other public places. Other suggestions have included calling on PAS
representatives in Selangor to call for standards of decency to be set
for Muslim women (and why only Muslim women?), as well as ensuring that
Selangor’s beloved state religious authorities are empowered to direct
Muslims who frequent the public spaces of Selangor to pray during the
appointed prayer times for Muslims.
Noises of this sort are, of course, to be expected from some of the
more conservative elements of the Islamic party that we have come to
know and love. But before the good ‘ol Mat Skodeng squads are let loose
on the unsuspecting public, and another bunch of Malaysian kids are
locked up in cages to be verbally abused and video-ed for the amusement
of the moral guardians of society, let us remind ourselves of a few
simple facts:
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 22 April 2008 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
| Results 1 - 4 of 130 |